Preliminary note: This literary review was originally published in Spanish in the newspaper El Correo del Golfo, where the author publishes a weekly column under his given name (Dixon Moya) an in this Blog: https://blogs.elespectador.com/actualidad/lineas-de-arena/la-vida-un-instante-a-proposito-del-libro-ahora-y-en-la-hora-de-hector-abad-faciolince/

Some of us have been defining the great novel, El Olvido que Seremos (translate to English as Oblivion: A Memoir or Memories of My Father), as a long love letter from a son to his father. These days, the author of that endearing work presents his readers with a testimonial document, several books in one, Ahora y en la Hora (literal translation is Now and, in the Hour, but I don’t know an official translation), which could be described as a father’s testament of love to his children, his wife, and friends. A different text from the first, Héctor Abad Faciolince once again moves the reader’s soul.

This book is not only a testimony of solidarity and affection for a just cause, that of Ukraine, whose population has suffered the invasion and constant attacks of the powerful Russian army following Vladimir Putin’s orders. In that sense, the author stands on the right side of history, as did those who exposed the Nazi Holocaust against the Jews, or those who now denounce the genocide of the Palestinian people by Benjamin Netanyahu’s government, as Abad Faciolince has also done.

Faithful readers of Héctor Abad always await a new novel from him, but this time he brings us a different book. Something that is not foreign to him, if we recall that Culinary treaty for Sad Women, which the author himself couldn’t define in its essence. In the case of Ahora y en la hora, it is a miscellaneous book, in which poetry appears as a special guest, at times managing to save what prose recognizes itself incapable of resolving. But it could also be seen as a penitent work, helping to offset the weight of guilt that torments the writer. A most unfair blame, because the author is not responsible for the event he describes, nor for human cruelty in general.

The best moment of this year’s Bogotá Book Fair, in my opinion, came during the conversation between two Colombian writers, Ricardo Silva Romero and Héctor Abad Faciolince, one from Bogotá and the other from Medellín, who share a common interest in the vast land of literature. In that delightful conversation, Héctor presented his book as the chronicle of a death foretold, because we already know about the death of the protagonist, the writer Victoria Amelina, who was killed along with twelve other people, including minors, by a Russian missile launched at a restaurant where only unarmed civilians were present. However, it is necessary to know the causes and details of the terrible event. 

Héctor had changed seats at the table with Victoria moments before the attack, an event that saved the author’s life, but changed it forever. The book we’re discussing isn’t just about that terrible moment, which could be summed up in the anecdote of a survivor. No, it’s much more. It speaks about the history and stories that took place in Ukraine, but it also introduces us to authors who are Ukrainian or born in what is, was, or will be Ukraine, even those of other nationalities, such as the great science fiction author Stanislaw Lem, a survivor of the Nazi Holocaust. Victoria Amelina joins the list, who will surely become better known in our language after Abad Faciolince’s book, especially her novel Dom’s Dream Kingdom.

The text is also a reflection on writing in general and the reasons for its practice. In the case of Héctor Abad, he concludes that he writes for those he loves (children, wife, loved ones), not like García Márquez, who wrote so that his friends would love him more. In other words, two different ways of conceiving the act of literary creation with love. Writing and loving. It’s a book that invites dialogue; it doesn’t impose criteria, and I think the reader may disagree with some of the ideas expressed by the author, who doesn’t pose as a prophet or guru, nor as a hero. 

The author insists on calling himself an old man who should have died in place of his younger colleague, Victoria Amelina, and he constantly reiterates what he calls his cowardice. I profoundly disagree with the author’s insistence on presenting himself as a coward; he isn’t, even though he does his best to convince us. Someone who presents himself with complete transparency, without pretending to be something he isn’t, without claiming to be a champion as others would have done, is not only an honest man, but also a brave one, in these deceitful and Trump-like times.

I also disagree with Héctor when he says there’s no blue sky like Madrid’s and compares it to Jericó and Carmen de Viboral, two endearing towns in Antioquia, a beautiful province whose capital is Medellín. That’s not true. There is no blue sky more beautiful than the one in Bogotá at the end of December and beginning of January. Most readers here will raise their eyebrows, shake their heads, and deny me. I understand them, because foreigners don’t usually come to Bogotá during these times, and most Bogotá residents leave the city, leaving those of us who stay behind with a wonderful gift. In general, everyone has an image of the gray or brown sky of my city, so they can’t even imagine it. Well, the truth is, everyone has their favorite blue sky.

In the final pages of the book, there is a profound reflection on death, one’s own and that of others, but especially that of those we love, the worst evil, as Héctor describes it. “Immortality must have been invented by a father who lost his son,” says a son who lost his father too early in life. What is the word for someone who has lost their children? There’s no such word in Spanish. Héctor wonders if it can be “deshijado” (de-sonified). The Spanish Federation of Parents of Children with Cancer has proposed “huérfilo” (orphile) to describe such pain, using the same Latin structure.

Héctor Abad wonders if any language has a word to describe the grief of parents who have lost their children. Indeed, dear Héctor, Hebrew and Arabic do have the words shjol and thaakil, respectively. These are peoples who are aware of this terrible meaning, especially since October 7, 2023, with the Hamas terrorist attack on the Israeli civilian population and the genocide unleashed by the criminal government of Benjamin Netanyahu against the Palestinian people of Gaza. 

As a Colombian diplomat, I believe that an act of justice and solidarity would be to open a Colombian embassy in Kyiv in the future. Not only have our country expressed its affection for Ukraine through figures like Sergio Jaramillo (founder of the #AguantaUcrania movement) and the author himself, but hundreds of Colombians have participated in the so-called International Legion. Although it’s a complex issue, it nonetheless involves the interests of compatriots in the conflict. If I may make a recommendation, I think the best ambassador would be Héctor Abad Faciolince, although he certainly wouldn’t accept it if the remote possibility arose.

I hope one of the first translations of this book will be into Ukrainian, hopefully through Compás Publishing House, that was originally called Macondo, a name so close to Colombians. Surely well received by Ukrainian readers, this book is several in one: a chronicle of a moment, but also a biography of brave people fighting for peace, an elegy of a heroic people facing the giants of the Earth, all of them represented by a martyred writer.

Human beings come into this world at a certain time, on a certain day, month, and year, just as we will depart at an uncertain time in the future. Life is an instant, or as another universal Paisa, Juan Esteban Aristizábal, better known as Juanes (famous Colombian singer), said, “Life is a little while,” as his mother used to say. Readers should keep this book on their bedside table. In any case, never miss it, because it’s never superfluous, the prayer that moves even agnostics, “Now and at the hour of our death… Amen.”

Dixon Acosta Medellín

On Twitter, you can find me as @dixonmedellin, and I explore the blue sky on Bluesky as @dixonacostamed.bsky.social

Blaming Israel for what is happening in Palestine is wrong because they are not responsible for what is occurring in Gaza; furthermore, there are many Israelis who disagree with the policies used to eradicate so many innocent children and Palestinians. The one to blame is Netanyahu and his coalition of extremist rightists.

There is someone else to blame too; the networks and many journalists, because they inconsistently repeat the word Israel when referring to the advancements of the IDF into Gaza territory.

Hamas is a terrorist organization, and what they did has no justification of any kind, even if the comparison of military forces used in this war is a juxtaposition. According to the Deutsche Welle (an International Broadcaster) and anonymous sources, say that Hamas has between 7,000 to 50,000 troops. https://www.dw.com/en/how-do-hamas-and-hezbollah-compare-with-israel-militarily/a-67166698.

The conflict in the Middle East is about territory, and one of the ideologies is that the land Israel uses belonged to the Palestinians.

Contrasting the Israeli army, “the International Institute for Strategic Studies’ (IISS) Military Balance 2023,” says that “Israel has 169,500 active military personnel in the army, navy, and paramilitary.

A further 465,000 constitute its reserve forces, while 8,000 form part of its paramilitary,” reports Al Jazeera.

The same article points out that Israel is using about 300,000 soldiers in this military operation in Gaza. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/10/11/how-big-is-israels-military-and-how-much-funding-does-it-get-from-the-us.

The state of Israel obtained this land in 1948, displacing about 700,000 Palestinians after the Second World War. https://www.britannica.com/place/Palestine/Palestine-and-the-Palestinians-1948-67.

If the Jewish community was afflicted by the Germans under Hitler’s government, the civilians of Gaza are being flagellated by the Hitler of the 21^st century, Benjamin Netanyahu.

I even go one step further and call him a terrorist who is feared even by the United States Presidents, Joe Biden, and Donald Trump.

Pavor is the right word to use when one antagonizes the credence of opposing the terrorist methods used by the right extremism of certain Jewish groups; it is because they attack one immediately as an antisemite in any way, shape, or form for not agreeing with the fatalist argument that Netanyahu is applying against the Gaza children, let alone, the women who are the most vulnerable and victims in this malicious genocide.

Netanyahu and his allies are the Hitlers of this massacre against women and children.

And if Trump, in reality, wants to stop this carnage, invade the Gaza Strip, kick out the army of the criminal right-wing of Israel (99% almost impossible), and establish a human morality feeding these women and children, stopping a conversion to a hatred sentiment which could come back later in life to victimize another generation, either of Palestinians or Israelíes.

It is time to stop this massacre!

Theoretically, the people elect the executive branch to govern a state, the legislative branch produces laws by which society must live and respect, and the judicial branch is the middle ground between the two, procuring to maintain some sort of neutrality.

It sounds like a logical definition when and if we were still living at the beginning of civilization; but too many centuries of stories of destruction, mental foolishness disparaging distinctions between what is to be good or bad, the confusion of gods, the use of religion to exploit mentalities for personal benefits, and worse yet in this twenty-first century when information, – bar or good – is at the tips of any finger in whichever direction, is when a new conception and definition of society starts taking place.

I remember telling my children when they reached the age of immersing themselves in the business or employment world this rule: There are three ways to confront society as malevolent as it is. First, you learn the law to learn how to violate it legally – using loopholes. Second, make sure that the field you enter helps you make a lot of money so you can afford lawyers. And third, follow the law strictly. An impossibility, but as long as the walk is not trespassing the gray line, one can live his or her life with a sense of distinction.

When the executive power is elected by a fraudulent and drugged mentality as it just happened in the United States recently, waves of uncertainties flow in any direction, as it is reflected worldwide.

Let us be clear, the center mountain population who are debating in which drug to use daily, were who elected Trump. And they are infected with marihuana, cocaine, fentanyl, and the worst of all, the false Christianity.

Trump and his henchmen know it well, and that is why he is combating Canada and Mexico for the profits of Fentanyl. Marihuana is not a concern any longer, just cocaine and fentanyl. The cocaine industry in Colombia is well established and managed by the DEA, the US Embassy (that is why the new ambassador in addition to be gay is a Methodist) named to maintain the course. The sowing in the Amazon is well controlled by the Colombian guerrillas, which has been for the past years. What they fight now is not for control. It is for pricing. They want a larger percentage

Undoubtedly, people running governments have not yet trespassed the image of power control for monetary purposes. They are at standstill in a space of nonsense eliminating the sentiment of change in a society’s behavior acquired during the development of individualized characters of interactions.

Trump’s inefficacies reflected in the innumerous changes in his latest rulings confusing European governments, have settled well with Putin and Xi opening doors to continue their planting of ideologies finding places everywhere they are accepted as a change towards dictatorships. Which is basically what Trump is beginning to do by changing every person with power in government agencies including in the military industry and institutions to perpetuate his stay in government.

The United States presidency is in the hands of the right as well as Congress. What a philosophical mind would think was perhaps having hopes in the neutrality of the Judiciary. But which one? Not now, and it will not be in the next decade or so.

What the county is living is the transition from a democracy to a dictatorship government which could be easily transferred as it exists in monarchies.

By the way, where is the Democratic party?

Society as we live nowadays is in a shambling revolt around claiming the existence of one god defined in various terms, depending on the religion one professes, even if you do not have one. Crossing or transferring development with evolutionists deepens the confusion in minds, who cannot grasp a profound knowledge of which truth is more realistic to their beliefs.

Analyzing current events, including the wars in all the continents destroying civilization and nature, cannot describe a good god; it must be a malefic creature product of an incredulous culture, created by a leadership mounted on the individual fatidic thought of supremacy and exploitation of others. Furthermore, this behavior can be observed also in animals of any species.

When we thought we were on the road to mental evolution and a society of tolerance in who we are as individuals and were able to think in any way we wanted, the latest occurrence, the election of a convicted felon to the presidency of the United States, transformed the entire perception of who we are and where we are going as a society. Expanding this thought to some of the groups he is electing to serve in his cabinet, the absurdism of criminal behavior among those chosen. Is that a good godly definition? Even worse yet, elected by white people denominated themselves as Christians following different church-associated philosophies.

Scrutinizing some structures in which humanity sets the basis of convivence as the judicial, law enforcement, religious, and pretty much all or any system, they behave diabolically without prejudice and carelessness for the consequences of said conduct.

In my previous article in Spanish focusing on my opinion of god’s existence and definition of religion, concluded that god exists in every one of us, as well as religion. But the tendency of every living being is to act under the malicious influence created by an internal living god produced by our thinking process, either any animal or human being, originated by the doubt of not acting correctly at least identifiable in human beings, in animals, who knows; however, comparing behaviors, one can predict similarities.

If we prefer to believe in a good god with a life on his reign after our death, is not the one residing as visible as we can see in the world. It is not a good god, it is a bad one, and as my research with Microsoft Copilot extension indicates different names:

“Throughout various religions and mythologies, Satan or similar figures have been known by different names. Here are some of them:

• Lucifer: In Christianity, Lucifer is often considered a fallen angel who rebelled against God.
• Beelzebub: In Christian demonology, Beelzebub is another name for Satan, often associated with demonic possession.
• Iblis: In Islam, Iblis is a Jinn who refused to bow to Adam and was cast out of heaven.
• Shaitan: In Islamic tradition, Shaitan is a term used to describe malevolent beings, often equated with Satan.
• Mara: In Buddhism, Mara is a demon who tempts people away from the path of enlightenment.
• Angra Mainyu (Ahriman): In Zoroastrianism, Angra Mainyu is the destructive spirit who opposes Ahura Mazda, the supreme god.
• Loki: In Norse mythology, Loki is a trickster god who causes chaos and strife, although not directly equivalent to Satan.

These names reflect the diverse ways in which cultures and religions have conceptualized the idea of a malevolent force. Each of these figures plays a unique role in their respective traditions.”

I am not a satanic individual nor profess any philosophy conjugated to a belief system related to a follower group; I am a simple observer passing this idea to those who can conceptualize it openly leaving out fear of sinning by their religious beliefs. The world is in the hands of a god who professes wars among us imposing false criteria and destroying possibilities of evolution to perpetuate human life in a convivence open to all principles of existence.

Colombia stands at a critical juncture as it debates the Proyecto de Acto Legislativo (PAL), a proposed amendment to the Sistema General de Participaciones (SGP). Designed to increase funding for essential services like healthcare and education, this reform promises to address long-standing regional disparities. But as the debate intensifies, research from Banco de la República, Colombia’s central bank, sounds a cautionary note, highlighting the significant risks this reform could pose to the nation’s economic stability.

Decentralization with a Purpose

Since its inception in 1991, the SGP has acted as a lifeline for regional governments, ensuring that funds from the central government reach communities in need. The PAL seeks to boost the SGP’s share of national income to 39.5% by 2038—a substantial increase aimed at empowering local governments and closing social and economic gaps.

On the surface, the proposal seems like an unambiguous win: more resources for underserved regions and greater autonomy for local governments. However, as Banco de la República’s economists emphasize, decentralization is far from straightforward. The devil, as always, is in the details.

The Risks of Overpromising

One of the central concerns is the ability of regional governments to manage the significant influx of resources effectively. Historically, some local administrations in Colombia have struggled with financial management, service delivery, and accountability. Without proper capacity-building measures, this reform could overwhelm regions, leading to inefficiencies, mismanagement, or even corruption.

As one observer aptly noted, handing over more funds without the necessary institutional preparation is like giving someone a sports car without teaching them how to drive. The risks of a crash—both fiscal and functional—are very real.

Debt, Deficits, and Economic Shockwaves

Banco de la República’s analysis is both rigorous and alarming. Using a mix of financial modeling and dynamic economic simulations, the economists predict dire consequences if the reform proceeds without parallel spending cuts or revenue increases:

• Rising Debt: In a best-case scenario, public debt could climb to 64.6% of GDP by 2038. Under more realistic assumptions—including spending rigidities that prevent swift budget adjustments—this figure could skyrocket to 102%, plunging Colombia into a full-blown debt crisis.
• Economic Contraction: GDP could shrink by up to 15%, with private consumption and investment declining by 27% and 43%, respectively. This would exacerbate unemployment, reduce household incomes, and stifle business activity.
• Fiscal Instability: The reform risks breaching Colombia’s fiscal rule—a key safeguard against reckless spending—undermining investor confidence and triggering higher borrowing costs.

These cascading effects are not just abstract numbers. They represent real-world consequences for Colombians: fewer jobs, strained public services, and a diminished quality of life.

A Path Forward: Responsible Decentralization

Despite the stark warnings, Banco de la República’s economists are not calling for the PAL’s outright rejection. Instead, they advocate for a more measured approach:

1. Capacity Building: Strengthen regional governments before transferring additional responsibilities. This includes training programs, improved data collection, and transparent financial management systems.
2. Flexible Transfers: Tailor funding to regional needs, recognizing that a one-size-fits-all approach is ill-suited to Colombia’s diverse landscape.
3. Collaborative Governance: Foster partnerships between central and local governments to ensure shared goals and coordinated implementation.
4. Accountability and Transparency: Develop robust systems for monitoring how SGP funds are spent and evaluate their impact on improving lives.

A Call for Prudence and Unity

The PAL highlights a deeper truth about policymaking: good intentions alone are not enough. To uplift Colombia’s regions without compromising its fiscal health, leaders must prioritize thoughtful, data-driven strategies that balance equity with sustainability.

This moment is not just about numbers; it’s about trust. Colombians must trust that their leaders will act responsibly, that resources will be managed wisely, and that reforms will deliver real, measurable benefits. And for that trust to be earned, policymakers must rise above politics to embrace collaboration, transparency, and foresight.

In a world increasingly defined by uncertainty, Colombia has an opportunity to show that bold reforms can succeed when anchored in prudence and unity. Let this be the moment where the nation demonstrates that progress and stability can—and must—go hand in hand.

It was an ordinary day that held so much promise. Like every morning, I woke up early and dedicated some time to prayer and meditation. I have always believed that entrusting my day to God is the best way to begin, but that day, something felt different, something I couldn’t anticipate. Though I would have loved to prepare breakfast for my children and take them to school, my schedule had a special start: the monthly Mass with our circle at the Lumen Institute, in Atlanta’s northern chapter. This institute, composed of Catholic business leaders, not only provides me with tools for the business world but also strengthens my faith and mission in this life.

That morning, Father Daniel Brandenburg spoke about talents—how they must be nurtured and shared—and how we must face our fears with unshakable trust in God. I left the session recharged, with an energy that felt like an inner fire, ready to take on any challenge.

After the Mass, my day continued with an important meeting at GLLV CPA, one of JNC LLC’s allied firms. On my way there, I received a call from a client, enthusiastically discussing a new venture she wanted me to be part of. As we spoke, I thanked God for every opportunity that presented itself, and soon, I arrived at GLLV’s offices.

As is my habit, I greeted each team member warmly. That’s when I ran into Rossini Rosillo, whom we all know as “Ros.” With his contagious energy and radiant smile, Ros always has a kind word to share. When he asked how I was, I replied with my usual phrase: “Excellent and improving!” We both laughed, as we often did, and exchanged a hug. Little did I know that this would be a hug I would never forget.

The meeting with my partners began like any other—productive and filled with ideas. But then, the sound of piercing screams broke into our room, shattering the calm. We rushed out, and what we found was terrifying: Ros was lying on the floor, motionless, while José Hugo, the brother of one of my partners, was desperately trying cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) him.

Time seemed to stand still. Ros wasn’t breathing, and his color was beginning to change. Someone called emergency services, while José Hugo, with remarkable courage, performed CPR. When his strength gave out, we took turns helping. None of us were experts, but we knew we couldn’t stand idly by. The emergency line guided us with clear instructions, and though the effort was exhausting, we persevered.

Suddenly, Ros took a breath. He was back! Relief filled the room, but the joy was short-lived. Within seconds, his pulse faded again. At that moment, I did the only thing I could: I knelt down. While José Hugo continued the CPR, I prayed a Rosary. I pleaded with God, with the Blood of Christ, not to let us lose Ros. I called my wife, and she began a prayer chain with friends and family.

In that moment, Ros took another breath. It was as if God Himself had breathed life into him. Just then, the paramedics arrived, took over, and rushed him to the hospital.

Hours later, the doctors confirmed that Ros had suffered a massive heart attack. They told us that if it hadn’t been for the efforts made at the office, he wouldn’t have survived. A surgical intervention saved his life, but it was the collective effort, faith, and God’s grace that made the difference.

Today, I reflect on that day. Death is a certainty, but we are never truly prepared to face it head-on. What I experienced taught me that teamwork transcends the workplace; it is a fundamental pillar of life itself. More importantly, I learned that faith surpasses reason. In those moments of uncertainty, it was God who guided our hands and strengthened our hearts.

Sometimes, we forget that we are not alone in this life. God places us in difficult situations not to break us, but to remind us that when we trust in Him and work together, miracles are possible.

Today, Ros is still with us. I know that when I see him again, he’ll ask me how I’m doing, and I’ll respond the same way, but adding: “Grateful to God because we have a story to tell.” And I know that when I look at him, I won’t be able to avoid remembering that moment when life hung by a thread, but God, in His infinite mercy, decided it wasn’t yet his time.

November 20, 2024, Atlanta. A lesson in faith, unity, and love.

1. Trade and Economic Policies

Latin America relies heavily on the U.S. for trade, investment, and remittances, with countries like Mexico, Colombia, and Brazil closely tied to the U.S. market. A potential shift toward more protectionist U.S. trade policies could impact Latin American exports, especially if tariffs increase or if reshoring efforts reduce U.S. reliance on LATAM supply chains. In contrast, policies that foster economic cooperation could strengthen trade ties, increase foreign investment, and stimulate growth in the region.

Countries such as Mexico, which enjoys a strong trade relationship with the U.S. through the USMCA, could benefit significantly if the U.S. administration prioritizes stronger North American supply chains. On the other hand, increased trade tensions between the U.S. and China could pressure LATAM countries to align more closely with one of the two superpowers, affecting export patterns and regional alliances.

2. Climate Policy and Renewable Energy

Many LATAM countries, including Brazil and Chile, are making strides in renewable energy production and are looking to grow as leaders in the global green economy. If the U.S. doubles down on climate action, it could drive demand for renewable energy resources and boost Latin America’s renewable sector, attracting foreign investment in solar, wind, and hydroelectric projects. A strong climate policy from the U.S. could further foster partnerships and funding opportunities that would allow LATAM countries to enhance their sustainable development goals.

Conversely, a rollback in U.S. climate commitments could have a chilling effect, slowing LATAM’s energy transition and discouraging multinational companies from making the necessary investments in the region’s green economy. This could leave LATAM more dependent on fossil fuels, impacting both economic and environmental resilience.

3. Immigration and Labor

U.S. immigration policy changes will likely have one of the most immediate and tangible impacts on Latin American countries. Stricter immigration policies could reduce remittances, which are vital for countries like El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras, where remittance inflows contribute significantly to GDP. A friendlier immigration stance, however, would allow for more workforce movement, supporting the economies of both the U.S. and LATAM by enabling the flow of labor and skills, especially in areas like technology and agriculture.

Furthermore, any adjustments in the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program or asylum policies will directly impact Latin American nationals, affecting social stability and economic contributions in both regions. This could mean either more opportunities for Latin Americans seeking stability and growth in the U.S. or, alternatively, higher social and economic pressure on LATAM countries managing migration crises if restrictive policies are enacted.

4. Geopolitical and Security Influence

U.S. foreign policy in Latin America has historically influenced political and social dynamics, with recent concerns over the spread of organized crime, drug trafficking, and political instability in some countries. Stronger U.S.-LATAM security partnerships could promote stability, reduce organized crime, and build trust. However, if the U.S. deprioritizes the region, Latin American countries may be left to handle these challenges independently or may increasingly look to China for financial and infrastructure support, shifting the regional power balance.

5. Financial Market Volatility

The U.S. dollar’s performance and interest rate policy are paramount for Latin America, where dollar-denominated debt is significant. Any U.S. election outcome that shifts fiscal policy, leading to volatility in the dollar or interest rates, can impact LATAM economies, especially those with large U.S.-denominated debt, such as Argentina and Brazil. If the U.S. Federal Reserve tightens policy, capital flows to emerging markets could decrease, depreciating local currencies and increasing debt costs. A supportive fiscal policy, on the other hand, would stabilize Latin American markets and encourage foreign investment.

Conclusion

The outcome of the U.S. 2024 elections will deeply impact Latin America across economic, environmental, and social dimensions. A U.S. administration that pursues robust trade, climate action, and cooperative security policies could empower LATAM to make strides in economic growth, sustainability, and social development. Conversely, a more inward-focused, restrictive approach could place LATAM countries at a disadvantage, amplifying economic pressures and potentially driving them closer to other global players like China. As the election unfolds, LATAM policymakers, business leaders, and investors will be watching closely, preparing for the wide-ranging effects the next U.S. administration could have on the region.

Before moving to the U.S., I spent years living in Colombia and Mexico, two countries that hold a special place in my heart. My experiences there deepened my understanding of the economic and social fabric that connects Latin America with the United States, as well as the unique challenges these nations face. It’s for this reason that I feel compelled to highlight the potential impacts of U.S. election outcomes on Colombia and Mexico. Both countries are not only economic partners but also vibrant cultures with resilient people who are directly affected by shifts in U.S. policy. This personal connection drives my focus on how critical policies in trade, immigration, and climate can shape the future of these two beloved countries. As follows there is a highlight for Colombia and Mexico:

1. Trade and Economic Relations

• Mexico: Mexico has one of the closest trade relationships with the U.S., primarily through the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). A new U.S. administration could either strengthen this relationship by further encouraging nearshoring or introduce new challenges if it seeks to impose stricter trade protections. Mexico’s manufacturing and automotive industries, which have developed in large part to serve the U.S. market, could see growth opportunities if policies encourage supply chain relocation from Asia to North America. On the other hand, any protectionist policies could strain Mexico’s export potential, impacting its economic growth and job creation.
• Colombia: Colombia is a major trading partner of the U.S., with a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) that facilitates the export of Colombian goods like coffee, flowers, and textiles. An administration favoring strong trade relationships with Latin America would support Colombia’s economic growth, but potential protectionist measures could hinder exports, making it challenging for Colombia to balance its trade amid pressures from other markets. Additionally, trade incentives could impact Colombia’s agricultural and mining sectors, which are crucial for its GDP.

2. Immigration Policy and Remittances

• Mexico: Mexico’s economy is highly reliant on remittances from the United States, making immigration policy a top concern. A more lenient U.S. immigration stance would support continued or increased remittances, which reached record highs in recent years, benefiting rural and economically vulnerable areas. Stricter immigration policies, however, would directly impact this income flow and place added pressure on Mexico’s social services if more nationals are unable to migrate or are returned from the U.S. In addition, labor shortages in the U.S. could impact demand for Mexican workers, which has ripple effects on remittance levels.
• Colombia: Although Colombia does not receive remittances on the same scale as Mexico, immigration policy remains important, especially for its Venezuelan migrant population, many of whom transit through or settle in Colombia on their way to the U.S. If U.S. immigration policies tighten, Colombia may face increased migration pressure, which would require more resources for healthcare, housing, and integration. Relaxed policies, on the other hand, could ease the strain on Colombia by facilitating the legal movement of migrants, creating new economic opportunities for migrant families.

3. Security and Anti-Drug Cooperation

• Mexico: Security cooperation between the U.S. and Mexico is central to combating organized crime and drug trafficking. Any changes to U.S. policy that reduce aid or shift the focus away from security could lead to challenges for Mexican law enforcement, potentially destabilizing regions affected by cartel activity. A proactive administration may push for continued collaboration under the Mérida Initiative, focusing on combatting drug trafficking and enhancing security along the U.S.-Mexico border. However, a more inward-focused U.S. administration may reduce funding or assistance, leaving Mexico to address drug trafficking and violence with fewer resources.
• Colombia: The U.S. has historically played a crucial role in Colombia’s security strategy, particularly in the fight against drug trafficking and organized crime. Any shift in U.S. commitment to these efforts could impact Colombia’s progress in reducing illegal drug trade and violence associated with armed groups. Conversely, a commitment to strengthening security cooperation would provide Colombia with much-needed resources to combat drug production and trafficking, reinforcing the country’s stability and economic resilience. However, Colombia may also need to weigh its reliance on U.S. security aid with the potential need to diversify partnerships with other countries.

4. Climate and Energy Policy

• Mexico: Mexico is both a major oil producer and a burgeoning hub for renewable energy, but U.S. policy changes will directly impact its climate goals and energy sector. Mexico’s proximity to the U.S. means it could become a key partner in clean energy projects if the U.S. prioritizes green policies, attracting investment into Mexico’s solar, wind, and geothermal sectors. On the other hand, a rollback on U.S. environmental policies could impact funding and slow Mexico’s progress on sustainability targets, as the country balances its energy mix between fossil fuels and renewables.
• Colombia: Colombia has been proactive in promoting renewable energy and reducing its reliance on fossil fuels, but it remains a major exporter of oil and coal. If the U.S. prioritizes climate cooperation, Colombia may receive increased investment in its renewable projects, boosting its economy and supporting its climate goals. In contrast, if the U.S. deprioritizes environmental policy, Colombia’s oil and coal exports may gain temporary support, but at the cost of environmental progress. Additionally, the green economy could face reduced investment, potentially slowing the country’s energy transition.

5. Investment and Financial Stability

• Mexico: As a destination for foreign direct investment (FDI), Mexico relies heavily on a stable and favorable U.S.-Mexico relationship to attract investment in sectors like manufacturing, technology, and infrastructure. Any instability in the U.S. post-election could lead to a cooling effect on FDI in Mexico, affecting job creation and economic growth. A U.S. administration that prioritizes stable economic partnerships, however, would attract continued investment, benefiting Mexico’s GDP and employment rates.
• Colombia: Colombia is equally dependent on foreign investment, particularly in the oil, mining, and finance sectors. Policies favoring economic stability and open trade in the U.S. would encourage FDI in Colombia, providing economic resilience and diversification. Alternatively, financial market instability or a weakened dollar could impact Colombia’s exports and currency, leading to higher costs for international debt obligations. Increased borrowing costs could also limit public spending and slow development projects.

In today’s competitive business landscape, sustainable growth and success rely on putting stakeholders, especially clients/customers, at the heart of every strategy. Companies that thrive prioritize client satisfaction, strengthening loyalty, reputation, and resilience to change.

Key takeaways:

• A client-first approach fuels business success while balancing the needs of other stakeholders like employees and partners.
• Flawless execution is crucial—effective communication, resource allocation, and flexibility are essential.
• Focus on short-, medium-, and long-term goals to drive operational efficiency, continuous improvement, and sustainable success.
• Implementing a strong productivity model enhances performance, resource optimization, and continuous innovation.

The Importance of Productivity in Business: Putting Stakeholders at the Center of Strategy

Sustainable growth and business failure prevention begin with a key principle: identifying and prioritizing stakeholders in the company’s strategy. However, recognizing stakeholders is not enough; it is crucial to put “clients/customers first” for any strategy to succeed. In an increasingly competitive business world, companies that thrive are those that understand that meeting client/customer needs is the foundation for creating value and ensuring long-term success.

In this environment, thriving companies not only recognize the importance of their stakeholders but also understand that the client/customer is at the heart of value creation. Satisfying client/customer needs not only ensures loyalty but strengthens the company’s reputation and its ability to attract new clients/customers. Businesses that prioritize their clients/customers are better positioned to adapt to market changes, respond to emerging trends, and personalize their offerings according to evolving demands.

This client/customer-centric approach does not mean neglecting other stakeholders; it means creating a balance where client/customer satisfaction drives the well-being of everyone involved. Employees, for instance, play a crucial role in this equation. When motivated and aligned with a culture of client/customer care, they directly enhance the clients/customers experience. Similarly, well-managed partners and suppliers contribute to a steady flow of high-quality products and services.

Moreover, a client/customer-first strategy is essential for preventing business failures, as it enables companies to be more proactive in identifying risks and opportunities. Companies that deeply understand their clients/customers and anticipate their expectations tend to be more agile and resilient, quickly adjusting their business models when unexpected changes arise.

Long-term business success relies on an organization’s ability to prioritize clients/customers within an integrated strategy that also accounts for other key stakeholders. Companies that place clients/customers at the core of their vision not only achieve sustainable growth but also minimize the risks of failure, ensuring a stronger path to stability and success.

Determination and Discipline in Strategic Execution

Placing stakeholders, especially clients/customers, at the center of a strategy is insufficient without flawless execution. Business success depends not only on designing a strategy that addresses stakeholder needs but also on the leadership’s ability to implement it with determination and discipline.

Leaders must make firm decisions and act consistently to implement their strategic plans. This requires a clear focus on execution, with the ability to meet specific, measurable, and achievable goals over time. Setting clear objectives not only facilitates measuring success but also allows for necessary adjustments when results don’t align with the plan.

Flawless execution requires several key factors:

1. Effective Communication: All members of the organization must clearly understand the strategic objectives and how their individual roles contribute to overall success. Alignment across teams and departments is crucial for ensuring everyone works toward the same goals.

2. Proper Resource Allocation: Financial, human, and technological resources must be aligned with strategic priorities. This means investing in areas that drive effective execution and avoiding resource dispersion in non-priority projects.

3. Continuous Monitoring: Strategies should be regularly monitored, with frequent reviews to ensure established milestones are met. Feedback systems and clear metrics help identify deviations and allow for corrective actions to be taken promptly.

4. Flexibility and Adaptation: The business environment changes rapidly, and effective execution also requires the ability to adapt to new circumstances. Companies that execute well are those that can adjust their plans without losing sight of their ultimate objectives.

Without consistent action, even the best strategy risks remaining on paper. Many organizations fail not due to a lack of vision but because they do not effectively bring that vision to life. Therefore, discipline in execution is essential for transforming a good strategy into concrete and sustainable results. Companies that achieve this not only thrive but also position themselves to lead in their respective markets.

Focus on Short, Medium, and Long-Term Goals

To achieve solid business productivity, it is essential to maintain a clear focus on short, medium, and long-term goals, adjusting strategies at each phase to ensure sustainable results.

In the short term, the priority should be ensuring operational efficiency and maximizing value in every client/customer interaction. This means optimizing internal processes, eliminating bottlenecks, and ensuring teams are aligned and motivated to deliver quality service. Productivity during this period is measured by the ability to respond quickly to market demands and resolve problems efficiently without sacrificing quality.

In the medium term, the focus should be on consolidating growth through innovation and continuous improvement. This involves continuously evaluating and adapting strategies, exploring new market opportunities, and investing in technologies that drive efficiency and competitive differentiation. At this stage, companies must be agile in adapting to environmental changes and fostering a culture that values innovation and constant learning.

In the long term, business success should align with a vision of sustainability that transcends immediate financial results. Companies must project a clear vision of their contribution to society and the economy, focusing on sustainable practices that balance economic growth with positive impacts on communities and the environment. This not only enhances the company’s reputation but also ensures resilience and relevance in a world increasingly focused on social and environmental well-being.

A Productivity Model for Sustainable Growth

A well-structured productivity model is the fundamental pillar for meeting these objectives and generating long-term value. This model should include resource optimization, process improvement, and the use of advanced technology to maximize performance and minimize waste. Productivity is not just about doing more but doing better with what we already have.

Implementing an effective productivity model is an integral process that involves various areas of the business. Key steps include:

1. Resource Optimization:

   – Process Analysis: Begin by conducting a thorough analysis of current business processes. Identify redundant or inefficient tasks and eliminate bottlenecks that slow down workflows.

   – Efficient Use of Technology: Incorporate digital tools, automation, and specialized software to significantly improve operational efficiency. Technologies like CRM or ERP systems can better manage internal operations, optimizing time and resources.

   – Continuous Training: Productivity models must include continuous training strategies. Employees need to be up to date with the best practices, new technologies, and agile methodologies to perform at their highest level.  

2. Measuring Productivity:

   – KPIs (Key Performance Indicators): Define KPIs to measure business performance in various areas. This includes client/customer satisfaction, operational efficiency, and resource management.

   – Continuous Feedback and Evaluation: Constant monitoring is key. Regular data analysis and stakeholder feedback help evaluate strategy results, providing the opportunity for adjustments.

   – Ongoing Adjustments: Productivity models must be flexible and adaptable to market changes. Continuous improvement is essential for sustained growth and evolution.

3. Continuous Improvement and Productivity Culture:

   – Fostering a Productivity Culture: An effective model requires a culture that values efficiency and optimization. Leaders should set an example, encouraging teams to maintain high productivity standards.

   – Automation and Agility: Automating routine tasks and adopting agile methodologies enable companies to be more flexible, responsive, and efficient.

   – Human Resource Innovation: Employee motivation and engagement are critical to boosting productivity. Companies should invest in ongoing training, fostering a collaborative environment, recognizing achievements, and offering performance-based incentives.

At JNC LLC, we follow a principle that guides our vision and decisions: God comes first. Our mission is driven by spiritual values, and we act with integrity and excellence. Next, we place our clients at the center of everything we do, recognizing that they are the driving force of our business. We also deeply value our employees, whose dedication makes our vision possible. Finally, we consider our business community, including society and the economy, and actively work to generate a positive impact on both.

We implement productivity models that optimize our internal resources while focusing on shared values with our clients. We define productivity not just in terms of maximizing profits but also in generating a positive impact on society and the economy, acting with ethics, transparency, and a focus on collective well-being.

With advanced technology, continuous training, and constant performance measurement, we maintain high standards of productivity. Our team is committed to continuous improvement, ensuring that all our operations are aligned with the best practices, allowing us to offer unparalleled value to both our clients and collaborators.

In the world of business strategy, there are many ideas on how to achieve long-term success. One of the most influential voices in this conversation is Michael Porter, who along with Jan Rivkin, co-authored the seminal article “Operational Effectiveness Is Not Strategy” for the Harvard Business Review. In this piece, they argue that focusing solely on management tools and operational efficiency is not enough. Instead, they infer that companies should put sales at the heart of their strategies. While this approach makes sense, particularly for companies looking to grow revenue, I believe there’s an even deeper layer to sustainable business success.

Through my own research for my doctoral thesis, I found empirical evidence supporting the hypothesis that corporate entrepreneurship and innovation are the real driving forces behind company longevity. Businesses that are constantly evolving, embracing new ideas, and challenging the status quo are the ones that not only survive but thrive. However, after years of experience in both professional and academic settings, I am now more than convinced that there’s something even more fundamental at play: putting God at the center of strategy.

Beyond Innovation: Stakeholders and God First

In today’s world, businesses talk a lot about putting stakeholders—employees, customers, shareholders, and communities—at the center of their strategies. It is now socalled ESG or the concepts of being sustainable. While this is a key component of success, I propose that putting God first is the ultimate foundation for true and sustainable growth.

As we look at numerous studies on friendship, they show that strong, meaningful relationships contribute to better mental health, increased longevity, and overall life satisfaction. I believe the same is true in business. Our ultimate friend is God, and when we place our relationship with Him at the center of what we do, we gain the wisdom, humility, and strength to serve others better. This is the foundation for transformational leadership that transcends mere financial metrics.

When we imitate God’s qualities—His love, patience, and kindness—we positively impact others. Whether we’re leading a team or serving a client, when we focus on sacrificial accompaniment to those around us, the results are profound.

The Power of Sacrifice in Leadership

The word sacrifice comes from the Latin words sacra (sacred rites) and facere (to make or do). In essence, sacrifice means to make something sacred. When we sacrifice our time, energy, or even our resources for the benefit of others, we elevate our actions to a higher purpose. For me, this is the essence of servant leadership.

In business, this could mean prioritizing the needs of a customer, taking extra time to mentor a struggling employee, or going above and beyond in ensuring that stakeholders feel valued and heard. Sacrificial accompaniment is not about losing something; it’s about gaining something greater. By putting the well-being of our clients and stakeholders first, we create lasting relationships built on trust, respect, and genuine care.

And the remarkable thing is this: when we sacrifice for others, we often find that it comes back to us in ways we could never anticipate. Businesses that serve with humility and empathy are often rewarded with loyal customers, motivated employees, and sustainable growth. Sacrifice, in this sense, is not a cost but an investment—one that yields immeasurable returns, both spiritually and materially.

A New Way Forward: Faith-Driven Business Strategy

As I reflect on the countless strategies I’ve seen implemented over my 30+ years in the professional services world, one thing is clear: the best results come when we integrate our faith into our work. This is not about preaching or imposing beliefs on others. Instead, it’s about leading with integrity, making decisions that honor God’s principles, and viewing our work as a way to positively impact the lives of others.

Putting God at the center of strategy is about aligning our actions with a higher purpose. It’s about recognizing that true success isn’t just measured by profits or market share, but by the positive transformations we bring to the world around us. When we do that, we find that both our personal and professional lives are enriched.

Conclusion: The Best Strategy for Sustainable Growth

Michael Porter and Jan Rivkin were right to point out that operational effectiveness alone is not enough for strategic success. But I would argue that even beyond sales and innovation, there is a deeper truth: putting God first and focusing on sacrificial leadership will lead to outcomes that are not only profitable but transformative. I am sure that if we drive our sales tactics by considering the wellness of our customers and clients, we are taking the very first step.

When businesses lead with purpose, honor God’s principles, and sacrifice for their stakeholders, they build not just companies but legacies—ones that stand the test of time. This is how we achieve sustainable growth and leave a lasting impact on both society and the economy. In the end, the best business strategy is the one that puts faith and service at the heart of everything we do.

Preliminary note: The original version of this text was published in Spanish in El Correo del Golfo, the first Spanish-language newspaper in the Arabian Peninsula, in which its author signs with his first name and can be read here:https://www.elcorreo.ae/opinion/dixon-moya/ignatius-sancho-simbolo-afrodescendiente-cartagena-mundo/20240907082721163693.html

Responding to the call of the ORBIS magazine, of the Diplomatic and Consular Association of Colombia, I have prepared an essay on an essential man for Afro-descendants in the world, a symbol of the fight against the execrable slave system, a crime that shames the past of humanity. As a preview of this historical investigation, I leave to the kind readers the chronicle of Ignatius Sancho, an enlightened British abolitionist, writer and composer, but his life began in Cartagena de Indias, although he came from much further away. Here is the chronicle of a fascinating life that links Africa, Colombia and the United Kingdom.

Ignatius Sancho was born in 1729 on a ship that transported enslaved human beings from Guinea to the port of Cartagena de Indias, although some versions indicate that this illustrious Briton was born in the walled city of the Viceroyalty of New Granada, today Colombia. Little Ignatius was orphaned by both parents. He was baptized in Cartagena and when he was two years old, his owner took him to the United Kingdom, where he was given to three sisters in the town of Greenwich, where he spent 18 years as a servant, but he escaped and ended up being rescued by John Montagu, Second Duke of Montagu, who, apart from returning him to free status, taught him to read and write, and interested him in literature.

In this way, and having become a successful independent merchant, Ignatius Sancho became actively involved in the world of English culture. He became friends with important intellectuals, writers and artists of his time, to name a few, the Irish author Laurence Sterne, the actor and theatre entrepreneur David Garrick or the painters Allam Ramsay or Thomas Gainsborough, who made portraits of Sancho, such as the one seen at the top of this text.

Ignatius Sancho was keenly interested in writing and music. He was the author of various works, such as essays and plays, but especially of a prolific correspondence in the form of public letters, which were published in the main English newspapers and later collected in books. As a composer, he left more than sixty works of classical music. Sancho soon became involved in the British abolitionist movement and was also the first Anglo African to be able to vote in an election. Ignatius Sancho died in 1780. He was the first person of African descent to receive an obituary in the English press of his time, and his figure remains relevant thanks to initiatives by institutions such as Rutgers University.

Today there is a very interesting circumstance, the foreign ministers of Colombia and the United Kingdom are of African descent, they are Luis Gilberto Murillo and the British Secretary David Lammy, who stand out for promoting the cause of their communities, as well as the Colombian vice president Francia Márquez, who recently invited the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Prince Henry (known as Harry) and his wife Meghan Markle, to Colombia.

I leave the idea of ​​promoting an activity in homage to Ignatius Sancho, which would allow him to be presented to the world and in particular to Colombia, because apart from Great Britain and the circle of specialists, he remains unknown to the general public. An event that could take place in Cartagena de Indias, the place from which a man who should not be forgotten, Ignatius Sancho, was projected for posterity, would be a cultural meeting that would serve to spread the word about the historical figure, as well as the discovery of his works, both literary and musical.

It would be very appropriate to declare Ignatius Sancho as a universal Colombian, a reference that exalts the human condition and that is the perfect symbol of diplomacy and integration between Africa, Colombia and the United Kingdom.

Dixon Acosta Medellīn

Colombian writer, in the official world is known as Dixon Moya, a career diplomat.

On what used to be called Twitter, during recess you can find him as @dixonmedellin