Society as we live nowadays is in a shambling revolt around claiming the existence of one god defined in various terms, depending on the religion one professes, even if you do not have one. Crossing or transferring development with evolutionists deepens the confusion in minds, who cannot grasp a profound knowledge of which truth is more realistic to their beliefs.

Analyzing current events, including the wars in all the continents destroying civilization and nature, cannot describe a good god; it must be a malefic creature product of an incredulous culture, created by a leadership mounted on the individual fatidic thought of supremacy and exploitation of others. Furthermore, this behavior can be observed also in animals of any species.

When we thought we were on the road to mental evolution and a society of tolerance in who we are as individuals and were able to think in any way we wanted, the latest occurrence, the election of a convicted felon to the presidency of the United States, transformed the entire perception of who we are and where we are going as a society. Expanding this thought to some of the groups he is electing to serve in his cabinet, the absurdism of criminal behavior among those chosen. Is that a good godly definition? Even worse yet, elected by white people denominated themselves as Christians following different church-associated philosophies.

Scrutinizing some structures in which humanity sets the basis of convivence as the judicial, law enforcement, religious, and pretty much all or any system, they behave diabolically without prejudice and carelessness for the consequences of said conduct.

In my previous article in Spanish focusing on my opinion of god’s existence and definition of religion, concluded that god exists in every one of us, as well as religion. But the tendency of every living being is to act under the malicious influence created by an internal living god produced by our thinking process, either any animal or human being, originated by the doubt of not acting correctly at least identifiable in human beings, in animals, who knows; however, comparing behaviors, one can predict similarities.

If we prefer to believe in a good god with a life on his reign after our death, is not the one residing as visible as we can see in the world. It is not a good god, it is a bad one, and as my research with Microsoft Copilot extension indicates different names:

“Throughout various religions and mythologies, Satan or similar figures have been known by different names. Here are some of them:

  • Lucifer: In Christianity, Lucifer is often considered a fallen angel who rebelled against God.
  • Beelzebub: In Christian demonology, Beelzebub is another name for Satan, often associated with demonic possession.
  • Iblis: In Islam, Iblis is a Jinn who refused to bow to Adam and was cast out of heaven.
  • Shaitan: In Islamic tradition, Shaitan is a term used to describe malevolent beings, often equated with Satan.
  • Mara: In Buddhism, Mara is a demon who tempts people away from the path of enlightenment.
  • Angra Mainyu (Ahriman): In Zoroastrianism, Angra Mainyu is the destructive spirit who opposes Ahura Mazda, the supreme god.
  • Loki: In Norse mythology, Loki is a trickster god who causes chaos and strife, although not directly equivalent to Satan.

These names reflect the diverse ways in which cultures and religions have conceptualized the idea of a malevolent force. Each of these figures plays a unique role in their respective traditions.”

I am not a satanic individual nor profess any philosophy conjugated to a belief system related to a follower group; I am a simple observer passing this idea to those who can conceptualize it openly leaving out fear of sinning by their religious beliefs. The world is in the hands of a god who professes wars among us imposing false criteria and destroying possibilities of evolution to perpetuate human life in a convivence open to all principles of existence.

Avatar de Ben Bustillo

Comparte tu opinión

1 Estrella2 Estrellas3 Estrellas4 Estrellas5 EstrellasLoading…


Todos los Blogueros

Los editores de los blogs son los únicos responsables por las opiniones, contenidos, y en general por todas las entradas de información que deposite en el mismo. Elespectador.com no se hará responsable de ninguna acción legal producto de un mal uso de los espacios ofrecidos. Si considera que el editor de un blog está poniendo un contenido que represente un abuso, contáctenos.